Teacher uses feather duster as cane
During my time studying in a mission school in Sentul, Kuala Lumpur, besides the principal and disciplinary teacher carrying the cane, almost all the teachers were allowed to carry one – the most notable “cane” being the feather duster.
It had a dual role – the feathered part to wipe off dust, and the handle
used as a cane. I remembered once my class teacher caned the whole class on the
back of our palms with a cane for making noise – Mohd Faizal Abdullah, sets out
how the cane should be used in schools.
Use the cane in school wisely
MANY are
against the use of the cane in schools as corporal punishment to address
problematic schoolchildren with discipline issues.
There are
of course advantages and disadvantages in bringing back the use of the cane to
curb indiscipline among students in government schools. Caning should not be a
problem if it is supervised correctly.
The
Education Ministry should weigh the pros and cons of bringing back the use of
canes in schools. Many parents are against caning as a way to discipline their
sons while an equal number are in favour as it is for their children’s own
good.
If caning
is allowed, only school heads and disciplinary teachers should be given the
authority to do it. During my time studying in a mission school in Sentul,
Kuala Lumpur, besides the principal and disciplinary teacher carrying the cane,
almost all the teachers were allowed to carry one – the most notable “cane”
being the feather duster.
It had a
dual role – the feathered part to wipe off dust, and the handle used as a cane.
I remembered once my class teacher caned the whole class on the back of our
palms with a cane for making noise.
This type
of punishment, even a pinch on the body, should not be allowed and I am totally
against it. Only hardcore, recalcitrant and disobedient schoolboys (schoolgirls
should not be caned) found breaking the school rules should be caned,
preferably on their buttocks.
This
should be done behind closed doors in the presence of the class teacher, the
disciplinary master and parents. Even that, too, with extreme care not to
injure or tear the skin or leave any indelible marks.
Parents
should be notified beforehand on how the caning would be administered. But
there is no need for parents to be present to witness the caning.
As for
public caning, the offence should be of the extreme nature in the likes of
students involved in gangsterism, fighting and blackmailing or extortion. We do
not want our boys to “graduate” as gangsters in government-owned schools.
Vandalism
of school property and truancy should not be punishable, but counselling given
instead. At the end of the day, the cane should be used wisely and with care.
As published in the Star, Malaysia, 22 June 2021.
Traditional School Discipline
Traditionalschooldiscipline@gmail.com
Stupid ideas. People don't need :" counselling" for things they KNOW they have done wrong.
ReplyDelete