Memories: Caning was just a pain in the backside
I was caned at school. It did not ruin my life, and I have no plans to sue for compensation. Nor did it build my character. To me, it was just a pain in the backside. – Mick Hume, writing in The Times (London) in 2002.
With fellow parents a while
ago, I mentioned that I had been caned several times at grammar school. One
woman looked at me in horror. “Caned for NOTHING, I suppose!” she cried, and
others nodded in sympathy.
No, I pointed out, on the
contrary, we were caned for fighting, bullying, persistent smoking, vandalism,
petty theft, and obscene insolence — you know, all of the usual adolescent
pastimes. But still they looked at me as if I were a victim of child abuse.
The cane was a “punishment
of last resort”.
That’s what it was when I
was at grammar school in the Seventies. By then, only our headmaster was
allowed to administer the cane. Which was just as well, given the state of mind
of certain other teachers, such as the little sadist in stack heels who made
miscreants taller than him get on their knees and crawl to the front of class,
so that he could look down on them while issuing detentions.
The headmaster used a piece
of bamboo about a yard long and sharpened at one end, like a big novelty
pencil. He was kind enough usually to deliver strokes with a straight arm, so
reducing the impact a little. Boys to whom he took a particular dislike
received the full bent-elbowed whiplash. He tended to gather a few boys in his
office to be punished together, to make you sweat and watch each other get it.
This also had the effect of making you want to tough it out in front of your
mates, trying to walk out as straight and nonchalantly as you could on shaking
legs. The exception was the boy whom I recall running out holding his backside
as if it was on fire, and going to the changing rooms to sit in a sink, while
making hissing noises with his mouth.
Some other state schools
were keener on corporal punishment than ours (not to mention what went on in
the private ones). One friend of mine, just old enough to have received the
leather strap at a Catholic boys’ school, recalls the relish with which certain
teachers doled out beatings, especially the games teacher who enjoyed whacking
boys on the behind with a cricket bat, and the bitter disappointment with which
they greeted the abolition of CP.
On the whole,
schoolchildren may well have been better behaved back then (although I wouldn’t
overdo that point). But what is often forgotten is that the cane was used in
schools like ours as part of a system of discipline. There were clear rules to
keep and lines to stay within — although we sometimes broke and crossed them,
we always knew where they were and what the consequences were likely to be.
Good, tough teachers tended to have our grudging respect, and we got on with
it.
The headmaster’s sharpened
cane left no scars on either my arse or on my soul. But nor did it beat me into
shape. The cane may not be an instrument of medieval torture. But it is
certainly no magic wand to make our child-raising problems disappear.
Extracted from The
Times, 16 September
2004.
Picture credit: Sting
Pictures
For more True Memories, click here
Traditionalschooldiscipline@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment