Art imitates life

 

Original Fiction – for adult eyes only

Good afternoon this is Raymond Fotherinton-Poke and welcome to Picture-goer, a weekly wireless programme exploring the latest films to be viewed at your local cinema. Today, I’m speaking with Mr Laurie Languid, who features in the new drama Seven Days at St Austin’s.

Thank you for inviting me Mr Fotherinton-Poke

Mr Languid, please tell us a little about the story in this film.

Well, it’s about a group of schoolboys who set about trying to steal a diamond that has itself been stolen by a gang of crooks.

It is a bit of a romp isn’t it, but there’s one scene that has caused a lot of conversation, isn’t there?

You mean, the one with me in the headmaster’s study.

Yes, tell us about that.

Well, without giving away too much of the story. I play a school prefect who gets mixed up in it all and the police are involved and I’m reported to the headmaster.

Yes, it’s quite a dramatic scene. Tell us more.

Well, as you might imagine the headmaster is none too pleased that one of his pupils has been involved with the police and my character soon finds himself spread-eagled across the headmaster’s desk and he then proceeds to do what headmaster’s do in such circumstances.

Critics and viewers alike have remarked that the scene is very authentic. Very little is indeed left to the imagination.

Yes, I get six-of-his-best, as they say, and the head who is rather annoyed with my character lays it on with some vigour.

Judging by the expression on your face each time the cane lands across your backside the thrashing looks very genuine.

Thank you Mr Fotherinton-Poke. It is only acting.

If so, you will surely be on the shortlist for an Academy Award this year. That cane fairly bounced off you. We even saw dust fly. Are you perhaps being a little bit modest. In the cause of your art, did you not suffer a little?

No, I assure you I was unharmed.

Not, even padding down the back of your bags?

No, no really.

One newspaper reported that the scene in the film was uncannily like a real experience you had at school. You were yourself beaten by the headmaster. Would you care to tell us about that.

Hee-hee! Well, Mr Fotherinton-Poke you might say the film was life imitating art. No, I mean art imitating life don’t I? I was indeed a visitor to the headmaster’s study ….

Would you care to elucidate? For what offence were you summoned.

Indeed, I was caned on more than one occasion. It was that type of school …

I am sure many listeners-in would be familiar with such an institution.

Yes, there were rules for everything. It was a boarding school, of course. And with rules come sanctions. And the cane was the first port of call for many masters.

I understand you were last caned only a few days before you were due to leave the school.

Yes, that’s true. I would have been in the sixth-form.

So, eighteen years old?

Very, nearly nineteen ...

Do tell us what happened.

Oh, it was the usual thing really. A group of us left the school without permission. Being out of bounds was an offence in itself, but we took ourselves off to a local hostelry and enjoyed a glass of mild beer. We were spotted by a master who was himself enjoying a bottle of pale ale. We were reported …

And the inevitable happened?

Yes, yes.

Was it very much like the scene in the Seven Days at St Austin’s.

Yes, the film is very realistic. Mine was a traditional school. Lots of ivy on the walls and mullioned windows. The headmaster’s study was all dark panelling. He kept an old leather armchair in one corner. I doubt that any visitor ever sat on it. That wasn’t its purpose in the room.

Yes, I think I can see that room in my mind. My own headmaster’s study was very similar.

They do seem to have certain similarities don’t they.

Was there a rack on the wall with a selection of canes?

No, not in this case. There would be three or four curve-handled canes of various lengths and thicknesses dangling from a hat-stand.

Ah, yes, I can see it now. So what happened next?

There’s always a ritual isn’t there. In this case, one was required to remove one’s jacket and lay it on the headmaster’s desk. Then you were required to take hold of the leather chair which had its back to a corner and you had to swivel it round so that the back was now facing towards one.

And what was the headmaster doing all the while?

Glaring! Headmaster’s always glare don’t they. He was watching me like a hawk.

Was he not flexing one of those canes and swishing it through the air.

Hee-hee! No, that’s rather rum acting isn’t it. Only a ham would do something like that.

Oh dear, my headmaster did that all the time. But, yes, you are quite correct, he was a ham. So were you required to select which cane from the set available the headmaster should use to beat you?

No, nothing like that. Indeed, I doubt there was really much difference between them. It’s not the weapon itself that causes the damage it’s the strength of the master who is wielding it that is important.

Yes, that’s true, I suppose. I ought to remark here that you were eighteen years old when this incident occurred, did your headmaster not think you were a tad too old for a tanning?

Ha! You should tell him that. No, I really believe that he saw every boy in that school as an incorrigible thirteen-year-old and treated him accordingly. My age was of no account to him.

You could have refused to be beaten. What could he have done about that?

Good heavens, no! I could never do that. The chaps would never let me live it down. You committed the crime and you did the time. I broke the rules, I was found out, I would take my punishment like a man.

Well done. Very spirited sir. So then?

Then, it was a curt command. The one that chills a boy’s blood. ‘Bend over the chair, sir.’ There was no question about it. The headmaster commanded ‘Bend’, and bend one did. It was a smelly old chair, drenched in the sweat of the generations of schoolboys who had folded over its back.

Yes indeed, the traditions of Olde England. Tell me, it was rumoured I believe that before assuming the position for punishment you were required to lower your trousers.

Bend over bags down! No, indeed not. I think those days had long gone. I believe they were still using birch rods twenty or so years earlier and that, naturally requires the haunches to be bared.

Yes, maybe in deference to the ladies listening-in we shouldn’t dwell on that.

No, perhaps not. So, my trousers remained resolutely up.

The headmaster delivered a good set of marks regardless of the clothing?

Hee-hee! Indeed, they call it six-of-his-best for a reason you know. I had to take my tea standing at a mantelpiece.

I don’t suppose when you hobbled from the headmaster’s study that afternoon you thought you would be drawing on the experience in an acting role only a few months later?

Indeed, not.

And you continue to maintain that the scene in the film is entirely acting?

Indeed, I do.

Well, we will allow picture-goers to make up their own minds. Seven Days at St Austin’s is in cinemas now. Good afternoon.

Picture credit: Generated by Artificial Intelligence (A.I.)

SOURCE

For more Original Fiction, click here


Traditional School Discipline

Traditionalschooldiscipline@gmail.com

Comments

Popular Posts