Movie: Spare the Rod
You will probably guess by the title that the movie Spare The Rod
is an anti-caning story. The 1961 British movie staring Max Bygraves (better known as a
middle-of-the-road singer) was based on a novel of the same name by Michael Croft.
John Saunders (Bygraves), a supply teacher with
progressive anti-corporal punishment views, arrives to take up a post at
Worrell Street School in a socially deprived area of East London. He is
assigned a class of pupils in their last year before leaving school and finds
himself in charge of a group of rebellious, badly-behaved teenagers from poor
home backgrounds, with no interest in education, who register their defiance of
authority by fighting, throwing classroom furniture around, whistling and
laughing during bible readings and smoking in class.
The school's headmaster Jenkins (Donald
Pleasence)
is well-meaning but has long become despondent with the seemingly
insurmountable challenges posed by his pupils and is resigned to merely serving
out his time until retirement. His view that corporal punishment is the only
way to maintain even some semblance of order in the classrooms (“You'll never
be able to handle them unless you’re as tough as they are”) is anathema to
Saunders, who states his intention to try all other methods of discipline
rather than resort to physical violence.
Saunders’s teaching colleagues are all resistant to
any change in the school’s punishment policy, with their attitudes informed
either by disillusion and the fear of otherwise losing control of their pupils
completely, or in the case of Arthur Gregory (Geoffrey Keen) by a seeming relish for
corporal punishment which borders on the sadistic.
Spare The Rod received some harsh criticism in
newspapers which were far from sympathetic to the film (scroll down beyond the
photos and clips for more on this.)
There are a number of caning scenes – unsurprisingly
since the cane is used routinely in the school.
CLIP 1
The headmaster gives Saunders a demonstration on how
to cane a boy.
CLIP 2
Gregory canes two boys after children ‘riot’ in the
corridor.
CLIP 3
Fred Harkness, a boy played by Richard O'Sullivan
(who we met previously in Carry
on Teacher) cheeks Gregory during woodwork class, with the
inevitable result.
CLIP 4
CLIP 5
Matters come to a head when as a prank the pupils lock Gregory in the school toilets overnight. The following morning Gregory seeks revenge on those he considers to be the ringleaders, singling Harkness out for punishment. His assault on the boy escalates beyond reasonable bounds, with him delivering roughly ten strokes of the cane to his left hand, which was twisted behind his back, and Saunders has to step in to restrain him.
Spare The Rod is often shown on digital television in
the UK and is also available
on DVD.
Picture and video credits: Bryanst Films
There were many reviews of the film in newspapers and
magazines. In this one from the Sunday tabloid The People, the author worries
what foreigners would think of Britain after watch Spare The Rod.
Bend
over, Mr Lyndon!
THIS
'CANING' FILM IS A DISGRACE
Review by Ernest Betts
SPARE THE ROD. British. Drama. Eight marks
for Donald Pleasence. Seven marks for Max Bygraves, Geoffrey Keen and Betty
McDowell.
HOW many marks for the picture? NOUGHT OUT OF TEN! And
what’s more, the producer, Victor Lyndon, can go and stand in the corner. This
film, which attempts to tackle the problem of corporal punishment in schools,
should never have been made.
Under cover of treating a subject seriously it dodges
the issue. It raises a vitally important question – to cane or not to cane – but
side-steps the wider issue of teaching as a whole.
The film plays with fire by dealing with a highly
controversial subject. But, for the sake of dramatic entertainment, the facts
of school life are grossly distorted.
So we get a kind of sermon dressed up in wolf’s
clothing. And any message the film may have had becomes highly suspect.
In fact, a leading education authority told me: “This
film does not reflect reality, and it may well have the effect of encouraging
school children to behave in a riotous way.”
The picture is set in a London East End council
school, to which Max Bygraves comes as a new master. He finds the staff ruling
the pupils with the cane. “You can’t give ’em an inch,” says the head (Donald
Pleasence) “Swipe ’em,” says his
assistant.
A sadistic flick of the cane appears to be the answer
to all problems in this school teeming with Teds, morons and little thugs, who
do all their writing on lavatory walls.
These tactics appal Max. Discipline by kindness is his
idea.
When he tries to stop the caning of an innocent boy,
he has a violent scrap with another master on front of the boys. It ends up
with the whole classroom being smashed up.
In other words, we are apparently shown that kindness
doesn’t pay.
Whether that is the intentional message or not of the
film, I don’t know.
But if it is, it’s most unfair. For the bunch of
crooks, thieves, liars and hoodlums depicted in Max’s classrooms is several
degrees larger than life – even in a tough East End area.
To foreigners this picture would give the impression
that we are still living in the dark ages of Oliver Twist." Although it’s
a well-acted and probably well-meaning effort. I for one WON’T be asking for
more!
As published in The
People, 21 May 1961
Traditionalschooldiscipline@gmail.com





Comments
Post a Comment