‘Unashamed disciplinarian’ reveals caning regime at nautical school

Mr. L. L. Janaway, an unashamed disciplinarian, who had been deputy head of Wellesley Nautical School, Blyth, for nine years described in 1967 the corporal punishment regime at the approved school.

Without having access to the school records, I cannot tell how many times I have caned a boy.

It is not something one likes to dwell upon.

From my experience, the majority of boys sent to Wellesley by the courts arrive at the school resentful of the fact that their rights have been taken away but, once they have tasted the first pill of discipline, they seem to be happy.

The first thing they find is that there are rules to be obeyed and any infringement can lead to punishment, such as writing lines or loss of leave and privileges.

LAST RESORT

Withdrawal of leave and privileges means that he is confined to the school and is not allowed to buy sweets or tobacco at the tuckshop.

The most dramatic form of punishment, however, is the Home Office-issued cane.

I must stress that before any disciplinary action of any kind is taken, a hearing at which the boy is allowed to speak takes place.

Reports from staff members on each boy’s general conduct and demeanour are submitted.

The maximum number of strokes a boy can receive with the cane is eight though under special circumstances, a member of the School Board of Governors can give permission for this to be increased to 12.

I cannot remember, however, any occasion at Wellesley when 12 strokes were administered.

It is all very well people abhorring measures of this kind, but I firmly believe the cane is a necessity as the ultimate punishment when all other disciplinary measures have failed.

This applies particularly to the occasional appearance of a bully in the school, which can be difficult to detect. Such a boy can completely upset the balance of morale of the school.

Corporal punishment administered to the bully is of immense value towards deflating him in the eyes of the other pupils and assuring the smooth running of the establishment.

The cane must not under any circumstances, however, be wielded indiscriminately. If this is done it loses its whole purpose and effect.

A member of staff of an approved school becomes, in a way, a psychiatrist. What would be good punishment for one boy, could be entirely wrong for another.

As far as I was concerned, the caning of sensitive boys was just not on. They felt far more the loss of privileges than the toughies.

On the other hand, the tough boy is more likely to benefit from strokes of the cane if the preamble before and after the caning is expertly done.

Provided the staff member has won the respect of the boys, the combination of a talking-to and the short, sharp shock of the cane often does the trick. Mind you, there were still occasions when pupils took six of the best and came up smiling.

Contrary to popular belief, the trousers are not removed for the administration of corporal punishment. The boy is requested to bend over a chair and the caning is done swiftly.

Stringent rules are observed and a caning has always to be witnessed by another member of staff and entered into the punishment book.

This book is signed by the visiting medical officer on his monthly inspection of pupils and he is not beyond criticising if he thinks that a particular caning has been administered badly.

NEEDED

During my time, I was in favour of corporal punishment for absconders and for rudeness to members of the staff.

The former because of the trouble caused to the police, school staff and on occasions the general public. The latter because, in an approved school run on naval lines, discipline is the overriding factor.

I still believe there is a need for corporal punishment in approved schools, provided it is subject to the decision of the headmaster or his senior staff.

It is of the utmost importance, however, that school staffs must be made up of men of the highest integrity who have understanding and sympathy for the children in their charge.

I never gave an inch during my service at Wellesley, but I know that I was trusted by the boys. They knew that caning was part of my job, yet they also knew that if a caning was decreed it was a just decision.

 Extracted from the Newcastle Journal, 10 August 1967

Picture credit: Sting Pictures

For more on approved schools, click here

Traditional School Discipline

Traditionalschooldiscipline@gmail.com

Comments

Popular Posts